There are two methods to detect the presence of C. Difficile. Examining for the toxin produced by the organism Detecting the actual organism. Although the recognition of the organism in stool cultures is the most sensitive way of diagnosing C. Difficile, it requires a few days to create this determination, making this a less useful method.Stool samples ought to be collected and analyzed. The current presence of C. Diff toxins in the stool is diagnostic of the an infection, and the results of stool analysis are generally available within a time or so. The actual recognition of Clostridium difficile bacterium by stool cultures can also be done. This, however, might take a few times, which may delay the procedure and diagnosis. C. Diff culture may be positive in a carrier; however, the strain of the organism may be one that will not cause infection.The three-judge panel has 3 months to render a decision, but it is soon likely to rule relatively, the Times reports . Arguments David Llewellyn, a lawyer representing the California Family Bioethics Council, said Proposition 71 violates the state’s ‘single-subject’ rule for putting initiatives on the ballot because it allows for a lot more than simply stem cell research funding, the AP/San Jose Mercury Information reports. Llewellyn also stated the citizen oversight committee – – which includes officials from three university systems – – has many conflicts of interest.